Skip to content

Pre-launch preview: not listed in search engines, and articles are still under review.

Assembly Wire
Topics
Cable assembly

Cable and harness RFQ template: get quotes you can compare

A copy-ready RFQ for cables and harnesses, what goes wrong when a line is missing, what eight public guides leave you to add, and how to level the quotes.

By Wataru Sasaki, Editor. Written with AI assistance under human editorial supervision.

Published 5 November 2026. Updated 5 November 2026. 11 min read.

Desk research. The figures here are calculated from published formulas or taken from public records, with sources in the notes. None of it was measured on a production line.

Quotes become comparable when every supplier prices the same revision, volumes, test scope and workmanship class, and returns unit price, NRE, MOQ and lead time on separate lines. The email below does that, and it adds what the eight public guides compared here leave to you: none asks about change notification or a cost breakdown, and none asks for the workmanship class of the cable standard. In the worked example at the end, a 16.7% gap between two quoted prices falls to 1.1%, and all three quotes finish within 2.3%; without the lead-time stock the spread is 4.4%.

The email to paste

Replace the brackets and delete what does not apply. Leaving a line in with "none" tells the supplier you thought about it. Allow time: 13 of 23 respondents in WHMA's 2026 survey said quotes take six or more business days, and the delay they named most was waiting for their own suppliers' prices, which a complete RFQ does not remove.1

Subject: RFQ [part no.] rev [x], [short description]. Reply by [date]

Please quote the assembly below by [date]. If anything is unclear or missing, ask us rather than assuming.

WHAT TO BUILD
Part number and revision: [ ]
Drawing number and revision: [ ] (attached)
Wire list or pin-out: [file, revision] (attached)
BOM: [file, revision] with manufacturer part numbers for connectors, contacts, seals, wire and sleeving
Application: [where it is installed, temperature range, fluids, flexing, vibration, IP rating]

PARTS AND ALTERNATIVES
BOM lines marked SC are source controlled and must be as listed.
Other lines: quote as drawn, and list any alternative you propose separately with its price effect.
No substitution after order without our written approval.
Material we will supply: [none / list, quantities]

QUANTITIES AND DATES
Prototype: [qty], needed by [date]
Production release quantities to price: [ ] / [ ] / [ ]
Forecast: [qty] a year for [n] years. This is a forecast, not a commitment.
First production delivery needed: [date]. Ship to: [address]. Incoterm: [ ]

QUALITY
Workmanship: [standard, revision and class, e.g. IPC/WHMA-A-620 rev _ class _]
Electrical test: [continuity and shorts on 100%, all contacts including unused and shells]
                 [insulation resistance: voltage, limit, on how many]
                 [hipot: AC or DC, voltage, dwell, limit, on how many]
Test specification: [document, revision]. Test records supplied: [none / with each delivery]
Crimp control: tell us how you control crimp height and how often you pull test.
Sampled checks: state n and c, and what happens to a rejected batch.
First article or PPAP: [qty / level] with report, approved by us before production starts.
Traceability: [serial or batch label content]. Records kept for [n] years.
Labels and packaging: [marking, bag or box, kitting, quantity per pack]
Compliance: [EU RoHS / GB RoHS, EU REACH / UK REACH, export control, other]. Certificate of conformity: [Y / N]
Change control: written notice [n] weeks before any change to materials, process, site or sub-tier source. No change without our approval.

PLEASE RETURN, EACH ON ITS OWN LINE
1. Unit price at each quantity, currency, validity date, the copper price it assumes and any adjustment rule
2. NRE: tooling, test fixture, programming and first article, each priced, and who owns the tooling
3. MOQ and order multiples
4. Lead time: first article, first production, repeat orders
5. Which tests the unit price includes, and the price of any that it does not
6. Cost split: materials against labour and test, and what would trigger a price change
7. Exceptions and assumptions, and any long-lead or end-of-life parts

What goes wrong when a line is missing

These consequences are reasoned from how quotes get built, not case records. Where a source backs one up, it is cited.

LineIf it is missing
RevisionsSuppliers price different builds, and the difference appears only at first article.
BOM with part numbersThe quote stalls or a supplier guesses. In WHMA's 2026 survey of harness makers, 16 of 23 respondents named part numbers as a recurring gap and 14 named missing or unidentified parts.1
Wire listLabour is estimated from a guess. 6 of 23 in the WHMA survey named connectivity or wire-list data as a gap.1
ApplicationA supplier cannot choose materials or price the risk. Epec calls understanding the application critical to quoting.2
Source control and alternativesOne quote uses the named connector and another a substitute, and the gap looks like a price difference.
Release quantities and forecastOne supplier prices the first batch and another the forecast, and tooling choices differ with them.
Workmanship classThe supplier picks one, and that sets how much inspection is in the price. 9 of 23 in the WHMA survey named specifications or workmanship requirements as a gap.1
Test scopeEpec notes testing may be on every unit or a sample.2 Two quotes can differ by exactly that. See which tests you need and what a sample really shows.
Crimp controlYou find out after the first failure whether crimp height is charted or only checked at setup. See crimp pull tests.
First articleIt arrives as a late cost and a delay, or production starts on the supplier's own approval.
Traceability and recordsAfter a field failure you cannot say which units share the batch. Records may be an extra if you did not ask.
Labels and packagingBulk bags reach a line that needed kits, and the rework is yours.
Compliance"RoHS and REACH" is not one thing. UK REACH and EU REACH operate independently,3 and RoHS rules apply differently in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, covering cables as well as equipment, with some exemptions.4
Change notificationA material, site or sub-tier change reaches you as a field problem, with nothing to trace it to.
NRE and cost splitNRE hidden in the unit price goes on being paid after it is recovered, and you cannot tell whether a price rise is copper or labour.

Wire is a case where published advice points both ways. VSE and the Connector Supplier article prefer generic wire call-outs, so the supplier can use what runs well on its machines,56 while East West's checklist says, for PCB assembly BOMs, that a generic specification is not enough.7 Settle it line by line with the SC mark: name what the design depends on and leave the rest generic.

Who asks for what

The comparison covers eight public pages read on 6 November 2026: Epec,2 East West Manufacturing,7 Switchcraft,8 Galaxy Wire and Cable,9 ACDi,10 VSE,5 PCBSync11 and a contributed Connector Supplier article naming TLC.6 They came from search, range from quote forms to general advice, and are not a sample of suppliers. "Partly" means the item is mentioned, asked only for another product type, or described as the supplier's own practice. A blank does not show what a supplier asks later in the process.

ItemCountAsksPartly
Drawing or sketch7All but Galaxy
BOM or part numbers7All but Galaxy
Which tests6Epec, East West, Galaxy, VSE, PCBSync, Connector SupplierACDi
Pin-out or wire list5Epec, ACDi, VSE, PCBSync, Connector SupplierEast West, Switchcraft
Application or environment5Epec, East West, Switchcraft, Galaxy, PCBSync
Alternatives or approved sources4Epec, Switchcraft, PCBSync, Connector SupplierEast West, ACDi, VSE
Compliance4East West, Galaxy, ACDi, Connector SupplierEpec, Switchcraft
Labelling and marking4Galaxy, VSE, PCBSync, Connector SupplierEast West
Volumes beyond the first order4Epec, East West, Galaxy, Connector SupplierSwitchcraft, PCBSync
Required dates4Epec, Switchcraft, Galaxy, PCBSyncConnector Supplier
Document revision3East West, PCBSync, Connector Supplier
Packaging3East West, Galaxy, Connector Supplier
Customer-supplied material2East West, PCBSync
Traceability or test records1PCBSyncEast West, Galaxy
First article1East WestEpec
Tooling or NRE treatment0Epec, East West, Connector Supplier
Test scope: every unit or a sample0Epec
Workmanship standard and class (cable)0East West, ACDi, PCBSync
Change notification0
Cost breakdown0

What you have to add yourself

Change notification and a cost breakdown appear on none of the pages read, which is what you would expect: both are the buyer's terms, not things a supplier needs in order to price. So put both in yourself. A small supplier may well refuse to show margin on a low-volume job. A split of materials against labour and test is enough to see what moved when a price changes, so ask for that and for what would trigger a price change.

None of the eight asks you to name the revision and class of IPC/WHMA-A-620. East West and ACDi ask for a class of IPC-A-610, and East West puts it under its PCB assembly heading.710 PCBSync only links to an IPC cable and harness overview.11

Test sampling is barely mentioned: only Epec says testing may be on every unit or a sample, and it does not ask which.2 First article is asked only by East West, with a quantity.7 NRE appears as an aside. The Connector Supplier article mentions avoiding tooling charges, East West asks about existing tooling and whether a test fixture is being quoted, and Epec separates existing from custom overmould tooling.672 None asks for it on its own line.

Document revision appears on 3 of the 8. WHMA's advisory team recommends a checklist that prioritises BOMs, approved parts, accessory definitions, specifications and revision controls. That is a proposal, not a survey finding.1 The survey has 23 respondents and calls its sample small and non-random, so its counts show direction and no more.

Comparing the quotes that come back

Put these on the same basis before you look at price.

AssumptionHow to level it
ScopeSame revision and BOM. If a supplier quoted an alternative, ask for the as-drawn price as well.
NREAdd it, itemised, to the total over the volume you believe. Note who owns the tool.
MOQAdd the cost of holding a batch: MOQ ÷ 2 × unit cost × your annual stock cost × years. Consider what the stock is worth if the revision changes.
Lead timeIf you would really hold stock to cover the extra weeks, for example because forecasts move inside the lead time, use extra weeks × weekly use × unit cost × annual stock cost × years. If you can simply order earlier, add only the extra safety stock. State which you used.
Test scopeAdd the priced adder and fixture for any test not in the unit price. If a supplier samples where you want 100%, ask for a re-quote.
Workmanship classArithmetic cannot level this. Ask for a re-quote at the same class.
Currency and deliveryConvert to delivered cost at your door on the quote's validity date.

A worked example, with invented round numbers: 1,000 units a year for two years, a stock cost of 20% a year and a shortest lead time of 6 weeks.

ABC
Quoted unit price£10.00£9.00£10.50
Hipot to the same scope, per unitIncluded£0.60Included
Tooling, fixture and first article£3,000£1,400£1,000
MOQ2501,000500
Lead time6 weeks12 weeks8 weeks
Price and one-offs, 2,000 units£23,000£20,600£22,000
Holding a batch, 2 years£500£1,920£1,050
Stock for extra lead time, 2 years£0£443£162
Total£23,500£22,963£23,212
Per unit£11.75£11.48£11.61

The 16.7% headline gap between B and C falls to 1.1%, all three finish within 2.3%, and A and C swap places. Without the lead-time stock the totals are £23,500, £22,520 and £23,050, a 4.4% spread. The example also ignores the cost of money on NRE paid up front. The answer depends on the forecast too. A overtakes B at about 3,020 units, and if only half the forecast arrives, at 500 a year, C is cheapest at £12.63 each, against £13.14 for B and £13.50 for A. With differences this small, decide on class, change control, lead time and how far you trust your forecast.

When tooling pays

Break-even volume is the NRE difference divided by the unit price difference. With invented numbers, take a tooled route at £3,000 and £10.00 each against an untooled one at no NRE and £12.00 each: £3,000 ÷ £2.00 = 1,500 units.

UnitsTooled, eachUntooled, each
250£22.00£12.00
500£16.00£12.00
1,000£13.00£12.00
1,500£12.00£12.00
3,000£11.00£12.00
5,000£10.60£12.00

Run it on the volume you would bet on, and check whether the tool would survive a revision change before you count the later units.

Notes

  1. WHMA Innovation Advisory Team, 2026 Wire Harness Industry Survey results, and Global Electronics Association, news release, 27 October 2026. 23 respondents, a small non-random sample by its own description. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  2. Epec, Cable assembly guidelines for quoting. Supplier guide. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  3. HSE, About UK REACH. ↩

  4. GOV.UK, Regulations: restriction of hazardous substances (RoHS). ↩

  5. VSE, The wire harness manufacturing process: a guide for electronics engineers. Supplier guide, a list of build data and not a quote form. ↩ ↩2

  6. Connector Supplier, I need a wire harness assembly: how to get an accurate quote. Contributed article mentioning TLC. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  7. East West Manufacturing, RFQ checklist. Supplier form covering PCB assembly and higher level assembly, not cables alone. Items asked only under its PCB assembly heading count as "partly". ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  8. Switchcraft, Molded cable assembly checklist. Supplier form. ↩

  9. Galaxy Wire and Cable, 5 things to consider before requesting a custom wire or cable build. Supplier guide, aimed at custom cable as well as assemblies. ↩

  10. ACDi, Need your electronics manufacturing project quoted quickly? Supplier guide. ↩ ↩2

  11. PCBSync, Wire harnessing. Supplier page. ↩ ↩2